<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Apple won&#8217;t make running Windows apps too easy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://windyroad.org/2006/04/20/why-apple-wont-make-running-windows-apps-too-easy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://windyroad.org/2006/04/20/why-apple-wont-make-running-windows-apps-too-easy/</link>
	<description>Extraordinary IT.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:39:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://windyroad.org/2006/04/20/why-apple-wont-make-running-windows-apps-too-easy/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howardfamily.id.au/2006/04/20/why-apple-wont-make-running-windows-apps-too-easy/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>At Macworld, Needham and Company analyst Charles Wolf is quoted as saying &lt;quote&gt;“I had a talk with Phil Schiller at the opening of the 5th Avenue Apple Store, and I asked him the question, ‘will Apple include a virtualization solution in [the next version of Mac OS X] Leopard.’ He said ‘absolutely not, the R&amp;D would be prohibitive and we’re not going to do it. Our solution is dual boot.’”&lt;/quote&gt;

http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/07/20060709120049.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At Macworld, Needham and Company analyst Charles Wolf is quoted as saying <quote>“I had a talk with Phil Schiller at the opening of the 5th Avenue Apple Store, and I asked him the question, ‘will Apple include a virtualization solution in [the next version of Mac OS X] Leopard.’ He said ‘absolutely not, the R&#038;D would be prohibitive and we’re not going to do it. Our solution is dual boot.’”</quote></p>
<p><a href="http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/07/20060709120049.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/07/20060709120049.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://windyroad.org/2006/04/20/why-apple-wont-make-running-windows-apps-too-easy/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 08:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howardfamily.id.au/2006/04/20/why-apple-wont-make-running-windows-apps-too-easy/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Sven on Tech feels there is noting to fear from windows support and doing so won&#039;t put OS X down the same path as OS/2

http://svenontech.com/2006/04/06/will-windows-support-in-leopard-kill-os-x/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sven on Tech feels there is noting to fear from windows support and doing so won&#8217;t put OS X down the same path as OS/2</p>
<p><a href="http://svenontech.com/2006/04/06/will-windows-support-in-leopard-kill-os-x/" rel="nofollow">http://svenontech.com/2006/04/06/will-windows-support-in-leopard-kill-os-x/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://windyroad.org/2006/04/20/why-apple-wont-make-running-windows-apps-too-easy/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 08:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howardfamily.id.au/2006/04/20/why-apple-wont-make-running-windows-apps-too-easy/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I, Cringely suggests that something like Rosetta for Windows, will be available in OS X 10.5.

http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20060420.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, Cringely suggests that something like Rosetta for Windows, will be available in OS X 10.5.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20060420.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20060420.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
